Robson and Safechuck vs. Jackson Estate: Wade Robson and James Safechuck, who accused Allegations Against Michael Jackson , will face court again. In HBO’s “Leaving Neverland,” they claimed Jackson hurt them as children. Legal papers indicate they will sue Jackson’s estate.
The California Court of Appeal’s Justices Elizabeth Grimes, John Wiley, and Victor Viramontes upheld the allegations and ruled against Jackson’s fully owned MJJ Productions and Ventures.
Jackson’s estate lawyer, Jonathan Steinsapir, was astonished by the court’s ruling and stated his family still believes he is innocent. He claimed the claims were false and made after the victim died.
However, sources believe Jackson’s estate would appeal to the California Supreme Court, making a compromise impossible.
The court states what Jackson’s claimants believe happened in the late 1980s and early 1990s. A date will be appointed if the Supreme Court doesn’t hear the case.
Robson and Safechuck kept quiet about what they saw and heard for years. Neverland memories sadden and harm their mental health. Robson alleged abuse began in 1990 and lasted seven years. Safechuck stated it lasted four years, from 1988.
The prosecution papers suggest MJJ Productions workers helped Jackson do wrong. Workers occasionally let Jackson play with youngsters without interfering, which may indicate he is behaving out in his room.
Holly Boyer, who backed the assailants, said child safety is crucial because kids are fragile.
Robson and Safechuck sought to sue Jackson’s estate, but the statute of limitations prevented them. Before, California law required lawsuits by 26. Child abuse reports will have extra time under a new direction. Jackson’s enterprises didn’t have to protect children. Thus, their claims were likely to be dismissed in 2021.
A second judge let the accused go after Vince Finaldi led the appeal. They must now show that Jackson was mistreated and that his workers knew.
Mariano Quindoy said Jackson’s Neverland house is also experiencing odd events. Workers are supposed to offer firm commands and touch them too much.
Witnesses report different events. These assertions are false, according to Jackson supporter Steinsapir. Robson and Safechuck also worked for Jackson. Robson initially supported Jackson’s 2005 trial but then altered his views. Safechuck declined the trial.
Also read: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals steps in San Francisco Street Dwelling Laws Suspension
In the documentary, Safechuck recalls his sexual encounters with Jackson. Jackson found them when they were young, and their lives had altered drastically. Their accounts demonstrate they were injured in diverse ways and places over time.
The most significant question is whether Jackson’s companies, especially his residence, protected Robson and Safechuck.
Both guys consider their closeness to Jackson and what happened after his 2009 death. Their lies in “Leaving Neverland” express their sadness as they remember and avenge.
Boyer finished their case by lamenting their plight and urging the court to take the charges seriously. The latest ruling represented a major advance in this long-running litigation. In “Leaving Neverland,” Robson stated he wanted to spread truth as far as falsehoods
Our Reader’s Queries
Are there any lawsuits against Michael Jackson’s estate?
At the ages of 40 and 45, Wade Robson and James Safechuck brought legal action against Jackson’s estate and two of his companies, MJJ Productions and MJJ Ventures, in 2013 and 2014. They claimed that Jackson had sexually abused them when they were young. However, both cases were rejected in 2017 because they…